Ubuntu sucks
Just had to vent it out. I tried to use Ubuntu on my T40 laptop after I accidentally irrecoverably corrupted my data partition because of Partition Magic merge partition operation. The blog title will most likely stir up some flames, very little though since I am not that popular.
Ubuntu Desktop was my first foray into Linux after a long period of time, just going on the hope that Linux would've improved on the desktop. I've been using FreeBSD as a server for a long period, but never really took the plunge to switching away from Windows as a Desktop. I didn't bother with FreeBSD because of VMWare's and other virtual machine implementation's lack of support for it as a host OS.
The out of the box experience was quite good (excellent even), and went relatively flawlessly, provided I hook up the laptop to the wired LAN, as wireless didn't seem to work out of the box for me. I liked the time zone selection where it zooms in on a map, makes it easier to select Toronto.
After everything was installed, came the problems that I had hoped would've cleared itself up by now. Especially since it was time to install some of the apps I would like to use such as VMWare which the RPM I downloaded didn't install by just double-clicking on it, instead I had to google some long instructions on how to set the thing up.
As I was surfing, I found that the "scroll" feature of my TrackPoint was not working. Fortunately I googled some instructions on how to do this. So my scrolling is a bit happier now that I don't have to go all the way to the right.
After Windows was installed on my VMWare, I switched to a slightly higher resolution... 800x600. And something appeared that I didn't expect... "scrollbars" and this was with autosize. It seems that the default theme of Ubuntu takes up so much screen space with the dual panel bars and all. So for now I just lived with it.
The next thing I decided to lookup was some FAQ for an old game I was currently playing. The bloody thing didn't layout properly. It finally dawned on me that this wide font called "Sans" which is used everywhere in Ubuntu is quite wide. Please note, this is not just Ubuntu that I have seen this on, I have also seen it in other Linuxes and I hated that font on every system I have been on. Note to the UI guys, not everyone has a wide screen (even if I have one at home, my laptop is just 1024x768). The fonts themselves are quite fuzzy, unlike the default fonts from Windows up to XP that switch to bitmap so they look quite sharp. Even when the ClearType is turned on, the fonts do not take up that much more space as this Sans font. However, the Chinese fonts were one of the best I have seen. It looks like it was done using a Mo-pit (Chinese handwriting brush).
Network setup with the applet that Ubuntu provides by default is such a Fugly tool. I switched it with the NetworkManager applet which does a better job. Next thing I hit was a the speed test site I use, out of a lark. The site uses Java. So I tried to click on it and as expected it required a manual install. So I went to www.java.com to download the RPM and as expected, the thing didn't work. Oh well, google found me something else though that helped me install it.
Skimming through more of it, I found out about EasyUbuntu which made life a whole lot easier I guess for the other plugins. I think that should've been a part of the original install as an option (because of licensing issues) rather than me trying to find out about it myself. And after setting up the components with EasyUbuntu, Firefox looked a lot saner now, when it came to fonts and such. I also wish SimpleKDE was used too. Oh well, I guess simplicity is not one of Linux's strong points anyway
I also noted some artifacts appearing in the buttons I had when I told Ubuntu to update the driver database -- which I expected to download new driver data rather than expect me to say what I found. Apparently, I am not the only one with the artifact problem. But by doing the fix, watching videos would be rendered choppy, so I reverted back. I tried using the fglrx driver, no luck, can't find my video device. I then tried to connect to my work using the AT&T network client. This took a bit to get installed because it was missing a library and the Add/Remove tool that comes with Ubuntu didn't show a list of libraries that I can download. Fortunately, google helped out with this page. So I was able to get the program installed.
Unfortunately its such an old version compared to Windows I can't use it. This was basically the clincher. I would've expected things to improve in terms of package management, at least I was hoping for something as good as the xBSD ports collection. But Linux seems to be polluted with .deb, .rpm and .tar.gz distributions with no standardized way of installing things (or at least with double-click simplicity and security risks like Windows).
The BSDs do have the same sort of problem as well, especially with the PBI that PCBSD made up, I am not sure about the differences with the PKGs and Ports, but ports work very well for me. So I decided maybe I'll just shrink this thing down and work with it later and use Windows instead. At least everything I need works. So I tried to installed qtparted and gparted. No luck, the programs just refuse to install. I just remembered that I it might just be available in the LiveCD and it was, so I am running the resize to see how it will go. Unfortunately, no luck. The partition does not want to resize itself. I guess it will have to be wiped out.
At least I kept track of what I have been doing sort of on this blog entry in case I want to run through the thing again, probably when Ubuntu 7 comes out and RPM + DEB merge into a common format that is acceptable to all linux distibutions. (update: I have tried going through this ordeal on my main PC just now).

19 comments:
Hey Ubuntu may suck, but your article helped me get middle-mouse scrolling to work on my T40 - thanks!
Good to hear that it helped. Good luck with using it. I am pretty sure if it weren't for the fact that I can't connect to the VPN, I may consider using it again.
I have yet to install Ubuntu on ANY of my various systems (desktops and laptops) that I did not have some kind of installation problem. I've installed Centos (red hat in disguise) Knoppix and Suse and never had a problem with any of them, except, Ubuntu. So WTF is it with people anyway that they think this distro is so amazing? It sucks in an amazing way... Indeed.
Ubuntu is a debian-based system. As such, it uses .deb packages, not .rpm's. No .rpm is going to install on an Ubuntu box (although you can apt-get install alien to convert rpms to debs and vice-versa).
Also in the latest version, 7.04, Network Manager is the default network manager GUI.
Also in the latest version installing restricted drivers for ATI and Nvidia cards is just a one-box check and click.
Also in the latest version, if you encounter a media file that you lack the codec for, the OS will ask identify the needed package automatically, ask your permission, and go out and get it automatically.
Sorry your experience wasn't too positive, but you might want to check back again, or again in six months when the next version is out. One nice thing about linux is that it is improving rapidly.
Also, one of the things I do is switch my fonts to Bitstream Vera Sans after an install. I haven't noticed the fonts being ugly out of the box (IMO they look better than the windows defaults), but you can also look in System->Preferences->Font and check that Subpixel Smoothing is selected. Also, if you put this in a text file in your home directory and name it .fonts.conf it will really sharpen them up (shame on Gnome -- not Ubuntu -- for not having the options this text file toggles available in the GUI):
(damn. the XML is getting kicked out by blogger. If you google Ubuntu + fonts.conf it will be the first hit)
do you even know how to use Ubuntu? Ubuntu doesn't use .rpm packages. And about Ubuntu not working well,I've had Windows do that more times than Ubuntu has
I'm going to have to agree with Twinkie here. Ubuntu sucks big time. I'm keeping it for the time being because I don't have the time for upgrading to some better distro right now. Maybe later. Ubuntu might only half-ass work, but that's better than not having anything at all on my computer.
And yes, you can install RPMs on Ubuntu. Alien itself needs RPM to convert the packages. So, you can easily rpm -i some_package.rpm. The only "drawback" is that it won't get into dpkg's package catalog.
Try using Linux Mint. It is an Ubuntu based distro, but has all the non-free stuff already pre-loaded and a lot of the "art" removed.
Some people may like the art that comes with Ubuntu, I just happen to be not one of them.
@lacey
God, every Linux install is about as individual as the people on this earth. My first experience Ubuntu was actually with Kubuntu and that was rather flawless. I install Ubuntu and it suddenly won't let me use my external monitor as default and people were advising me to start editing files to get it to work. Why should I have to? Native support in Windows XP (and in Vista by large now) for graphics adapters is decent and actually works the vast majority of time. For anyone who proclaims that Linux is at this point ready to completely replace Windows as the desktop OS for everyone, check to see if they have a computer science degree first. Linux is not ready for showtime at that level yet.
I can say this, ive been using what is it? 7.04 version of the Ubuntu Linux distro and everything works as far as drivers, I found the codecs and all for file formats, and ive been messing around with a few other things. The only thing that keeps me from using it as my main operating system is that Macromedia flash will NOT install correctly (AND YES) I have tried the other flash players and the dont work hardly at all. Also Im not too savy with the WINE Windows Emulator. It seems to be working fine but I just wish it was easier to use. I use xfire and for some strange reason, all the display names have the "?" in them. I guess thats because Ubuntu doesnt have the special characters Windows has. But still, great OS and sorry with your luck on it man but you may have alot of your problems fixed in this new version 7.10 or whatever.
I really hate ubuntu, and all debian based distros for that matter. Redhat is just overall better.
I agree with Sean.
Ubuntu is not ready for the home user - yet.
Hey I've been using Ubuntu 7.10 with no problems . You have to understand that Ubuntu uses .debs not .rpms . It's based on Debian GNU/Linux .
You can convert install programs through the Synaptic Package Manager with no problems . I use FreeBSD , Desktop BSD as well as PC-BSD , Debian GNU/Linux ... And you guessed it Ubuntu !
At work I use Windows XP :0)
Check my blog ...
http://www.uselinuxorbsdforfree.blogspot.com/
Take care !
I've been using Ubuntu since 7.10 came out, and I love it. That said I hit a few stumbling blocks moving to it full time. On my blog, I even wrote the 8 reasons not to install Ubuntu but a lot of it comes down to the fact, in my opinion, that it is still a work in progress. Linux has grown up quick since Ubuntu has been around, and that's a good thing. It will be a while yet before it's a real contender.
I'm running 7.10 now on my t40 with no problems at all. It' was actually easier to install then any M$ OS.
maybe you should give it another try.
I'm still debating on going total ubuntu.
A lot of things that I normally do, do not work under this OS.
"VMWare which the RPM I downloaded didn't install by just double-clicking on it, instead I had to google some long instructions on how to set the thing up."
Stopped reading after this. So, you try a new distro without knowing that uses something called apt-get/debs/synaptic/aptitude instead of the old and not so good rpm, and it gets criticized for that? Someone didn't make homework here... When I have to try a new system, I try to read as much of it as I can and I avoid as much as I can the "Googling Helpdesk". I mean, c'on, if you get used to go to google for every minir issue, you won't last long in the IT business...
Ok, now back to the ubuntu subject... I use it at home, at the office, at clients (we have about 300 Ubuntu workstations). All works fine, the numbers of help desk tickets has gone bellow half than the time we used Windows (not saying Windows is bad, just saying that users more easily blow up a Windows workstation that an *nix workstation). So I don't get it...
I didn't read your entire article - but you are right - Ubuntu sucks. Ubuntu server sucks even more.
Debian is good but if you have very important production servers, it is better to stick to commercial Linux like Redhat or Suse, or the free CentOS.
I guess Ubuntu is just meant to be a user-friendly Linux for desktop.
The best of them all is FreeBSD
Initially I thought, WOW this is it! I installed on my Dell laptop and it connected wirelessly via my wi-fi but then it became intermittent along with various other devices. I went to the forums and received no response and noticed all of the other similar posts that are sitting with no responses for weeks and weeks. Went to the IRC support forum and OMG what a clusterf*** that was and of course I got no response and wasn't notice until I went upper case and they insisted that everyone ignore me because I illustrated my opinion about they support process. I provide professional lan, lan-wan and wlan support for XP, Vista and Mac and I understand how the support process works. The Ubuntu support community is a joke and I wasn't surprised to find many "Ubuntu Sucks" google hits when I looked. Only 20,100
I installed Ubuntu and everything worked great BUT Ktorrent and uTorrent gave me very SLOW transfers (10K vs. 120K on Windows), I tried everything and went back to Windows where my torrents fly!
Post a Comment